From: | Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests |
Date: | 2008-05-29 12:22:31 |
Message-ID: | 483EA007.4030404@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> we would like to be able to use and ship pg_regress and the PostgreSQL
>> test suite independently of the PostgreSQL build environment, for
>> testing and maybe even as a separate package to be build and shipped
>> with the OS for others to test their setup. Does this sound like a sane
>> and OK thing to do?
>
> The RPM packages have done this since approximately forever. You might
> want to look at the patches used there.
Hi,
yes [1] is the same that we have been using internally.
Let me reformulate my question: would it be better to include something
like the attached patch in PostgreSQL, than have every distributor of
the tests apply it?
[1]
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/postgresql/F-9/postgresql-test.patch?rev=1.3&view=auto
-J
--
Jørgen Austvik, Software Engineering - QA
Sun Microsystems Database Technology Group
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_regress_contribdir.patch | text/x-patch | 3.3 KB |
jorgen_austvik.vcf | text/x-vcard | 418 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2008-05-29 13:45:32 | Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-05-29 12:16:30 | Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems |