Re: Building dynamic contents from database

From: Frederic Jolliton <fred-pg(at)jolliton(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Building dynamic contents from database
Date: 2003-12-29 20:23:19
Message-ID: 863cb31ih4.fsf@mau.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com> writes:

>> name | state | from_date | to_date
>> ------------------------------------
>> foo | state2 | <date> | <date>
>> foo | state1 | <date> | <date>
>> bar | state4 | <date> | <date>
>> ...
>> foo | state3 | <date> | <date>
>
> I would consider using only 1 table, where a NULL to_date indicates the
> current state, and you have a compound index on (name, to_date) to support
> querying for current state. Perhaps you could use a partial index as well to
> speed up those queries, but I haven't yet explored that feature of
> PostgreSQL.

Well.. There is already several indexes (choosed accordingly to
performance test). And, also, table current contains some fields not
found in history, so only 1 table for both type of information is not
ideal.

--
Frédéric Jolliton

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith C. Perry 2003-12-29 20:24:48 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2003-12-29 20:21:07 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?