| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Testing of MVCC |
| Date: | 2005-08-10 20:41:15 |
| Message-ID: | 8617.1123706475@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> writes:
> It seems to me that contrib/dblink could greatly simplify the design and
> coding of multi-user regression tests. Is there objection to a portion
> of src/test/regress depending on contrib/dblink?
Yes. Given the difficulties we had in getting the contrib/dblink
regression tests to pass in the buildfarm, and the environmental
sensitivity it has, I don't think making the core tests depend on it
is a hot idea. In any case I doubt it would be very useful, since
a script based on that still doesn't let you issue concurrent queries.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-08-10 20:46:11 | Re: escape string type for upcoming 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Shane | 2005-08-10 20:31:59 | Re: Index not being used unless enable_seqscan=false |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Westmacott | 2005-08-10 21:03:53 | Re: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-08-10 20:24:39 | Re: small proposal: pg_config record flag variables? |