From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: small proposal: pg_config record flag variables? |
Date: | 2005-08-10 20:24:39 |
Message-ID: | 1123705479.4010.34.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 11:26 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >>On a related topic, why is pg_config not part of the RPM builds?
> >
> >Hmm? It's definitely in Red Hat's RPMs, can't speak for anyone else's.
> >
> >(Red Hat puts it in the postgresql-devel RPM, which might be a poor
> >choice, but it's there.)
> >
>
> That's where it is in the PDGD rpms too:
>
> [andrew(at)alphonso ~]$ rpm -q -l -p postgresql-devel-8.0.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
> 2>/dev/null | grep bin/pg_config
> /usr/bin/pg_config
OK... I was at a client site when I ran that the other day and it sounds
like they just hadn't installed the devel rpm. Guess I hadn't noticed
which rpm it was actually in previously.
Thanks,
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-10 20:41:15 | Re: [GENERAL] Testing of MVCC |
Previous Message | elein | 2005-08-10 20:18:11 |