From: | Steven Schlansker <steven(at)likeness(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org postgresql" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Trimming transaction logs after extended WAL archive failures |
Date: | 2014-03-25 23:52:43 |
Message-ID: | 85ED84E1-663B-49CC-8EC1-5C69929B46B5@likeness.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 04:17 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:02 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/25/2014 03:54 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 25, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 03/25/2014 01:56 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a Postgres 9.3.3 database machine. Due to some intelligent work on the part of someone who shall remain nameless, the WAL archive command included a ‘> /dev/null 2>&1’ which masked archive failures until the disk entirely filled with 400GB of pg_xlog entries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have fixed the archive command and can see WAL segments being shipped off of the server, however the xlog remains at a stable size and is not shrinking. In fact, it’s still growing at a (much slower) rate.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what is wal_keep_segments set at in postgresql.conf?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5000. There are currently about 18000 WAL segments in pg_xlog.
>>>
>>> I guess what I should have also asked previously is what exactly are you doing, are you streaming as well as archiving?
>>
>> Yes, we have both enabled. Here’s some hopefully relevant configuration stanzas and information:
>>
>
>>
>> I have verified that WAL segments are being archived to the archive destination, and that the slave is connected and receiving segments.
>
> Some more questions, what happens when things begin to dawn on me:)
>
> You said the disk filled up entirely with log files yet currently the number(size) of logs is growing.
It’s holding stable now. I tried to vacuum up to clean some space which turned out to generate more pg_xlog activity than it saved space, and (I assume) the archiver fell behind and that was the source of the growing log. There haven’t been any new segments since I stopped doing that.
>
> So did you grow the disk, move the logs or find some way to reduce the number?
I used tune2fs to use some of the “reserved” filesystem space temporarily. I was too scared to move log segments away, this is a production database.
>
> What happened to the server when the disk filled up?
Postgresql PANICed due to failed writes.
Mar 25 22:46:41 prd-db1a postgres[18995]: [12-1] db=checkin,user=postgres PANIC: could not write to file "pg_xlog/xlogtemp.18995": No space left on device
> In other words do the log entries at the time show it recovered gracefully?
The database is currently up and running, although I do not have much time until it fails again, there are only a few precious GB free.
> If not what did you do to get it running again?
>
tune2fs and restarted postgres
> The concern being that the server is actually fully recovered.
I believe it is. Our production site is back up and running seemingly normally, the postgres log has no obvious complaining.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-03-25 23:58:38 | Re: Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3 |
Previous Message | Oscar Calderon | 2014-03-25 23:50:43 | A guide about some topics of Associate Certification |