Re: Rationale for aversion to the central database?

From: Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)" <bob(dot)basques(at)ci(dot)stpaul(dot)mn(dot)us>
Cc: Steven Lembark <lembark(at)wrkhors(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rationale for aversion to the central database?
Date: 2018-04-27 15:46:33
Message-ID: 8551CC0B-E3F8-437C-8458-617B26128C95@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Apr 27, 2018, at 8:45 , Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <bob(dot)basques(at)ci(dot)stpaul(dot)mn(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Just chiming in . . . we’ve taken a somewhat different approach and actually encourage our programmers to build out thier own DBs. We’re using Postgres to aggregate many varied datasources into postgres as a cahing system, and then develop against this aggregated data. Yes, we understand that the realtime stuff is a laggy process. The intent here is to give the programmers a background in DB operation and performance expectations, especially since we primarilry build for Web Use.

I’d love to see a blog post about this.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2018-04-27 15:59:11 Re: Asynchronous Trigger?
Previous Message Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) 2018-04-27 15:45:11 Re: Rationale for aversion to the central database?