Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jacky Leng <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual
Date: 2009-02-19 16:01:45
Message-ID: 8519.1235059305@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Now that think about this more, I don't see either how that check in
> EvalPlanQual could ever be true.

It's there primarily to make the tuple chain chasing code the same
as in other places. Whether it happens to be dead code today because of
arcane details of the usage of EvalPlanQual isn't very interesting.
(I'm unconvinced that it is dead code, but even if it is it'd be folly
to remove it.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-02-19 16:06:35 Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual
Previous Message ohp 2009-02-19 16:01:27 Re: pg_restore new option -m