From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jacky Leng <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual |
Date: | 2009-02-19 12:01:24 |
Message-ID: | 499D4A14.4040902@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jacky Leng wrote:
>> Tuples with an aborted xmin can be vacuumed right away. When we're
>> following the update chain in EvalPlanQual, it's possible that the updater
>> has aborted, the updated dead tuple is vacuumed away, and the slot is
>> reused for another unrelated tuple.
>
> But if the updater aborted, how can EvalPlanQual be called?
> In this situation (updater aborted), EvalPlanQual's caller (such as
> ExecUpdate and ExecDelete)
> should get "HeapTupleMayBeUpdated", rather than "HeapTupleUpdated".
Well, consider this update chain:
A -> B -> C
If A is the tuple visible to the snapshot of the updating query, and the
updater of (A->B) has committed, heap_update/delete call in
ExecUpdate/Delete will return HeapTupleUpdate.
Now that think about this more, I don't see either how that check in
EvalPlanQual could ever be true.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasen Betts | 2009-02-19 12:58:18 | Re: Good Delimiter for copy command |
Previous Message | Max | 2009-02-19 11:28:27 | PostgreSQL Translation - PL/pgSQL current |