Re: PG 8.1beta3 out soon

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 8.1beta3 out soon
Date: 2005-10-11 02:51:06
Message-ID: 8505.1128999066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Not a bug fix, but this bug still hasn't been looked at:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00499.php

I'm not really convinced that's a bug, and in any case it's not going to
be dealt with in 8.1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trent Shipley 2005-10-11 02:58:49 relational class vs partitioned table (was Inherited indexes)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-10-11 02:32:27 Re: PG 8.1beta3 out soon