Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>My take: we should document this better, but it ain't broke so it don't
>>need fixing,
>>
>>
>
>Actually, my take on your analysis is that there should be a way to get
>at "use warnings" (I assume that's disallowed in trusted plperl).
>
>
>
>
Yes, we can't allow "use" in trusted code. But we could turn it on in
plperl.c, just as we can turn on strict mode, and HEAD already has the
infrastructure for logging lexical warnings - that's a new feature. I
will investigate turning the switch.
cheers
andrew