Re:

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: roypgsqlgen(at)xemaps(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2001-10-16 06:10:59
Message-ID: 8472.1003212659@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

roypgsqlgen(at)xemaps(dot)com writes:
> OK, so from what I understand if you don't tell it to do a "FULL"
> vacuum, it will not minimize space by moving tuples acrss blocks to
> compact a table. But does that mean at some point you have to do a
> "FULL" vacuum?

The theory is that you should reach a steady state where the table file
doesn't get any bigger (assuming that the number of live tuples in the
table isn't getting bigger, that is).

Of course the gap between theory and practice is sometimes large.
We'll see how it goes when 7.2 is in the field...

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • at 2001-10-15 18:13:14 from roypgsqlgen

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karen Ellrick 2001-10-16 06:35:33 Re: WWW interface for postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-16 05:35:19 Re: Why do I get a circular query when I insert tuples with this rule ?