From: roypgsqlgen(at)xemaps(dot)com
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Date: 2001-10-15 18:13:14
Message-ID: 200110151813.f9FIDrX75840@mail1.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>There is a faster, non-exclusive-locking VACUUM in the CVS now; this
>should become part of 7.2. You can download the nightly snapsot and build
>it to test it with your application.
>HTH.

OK, so from what I understand if you don't tell it to do a "FULL" vacuum, it will not minimize space by moving tuples acrss blocks to compact a table. But does that mean at some point you have to do a "FULL" vacuum?

Roy.

Responses

  • Re: at 2001-10-16 06:10:59 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaurav Priyolkar 2001-10-15 18:19:19 Re: "Relation x does not exist" error when x does exist
Previous Message John P. Looney 2001-10-15 17:29:08 Re: Embedded postgres ?