Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic
Date: 2014-08-19 17:39:34
Message-ID: 8453.1408469974@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Well, if we want a sample command in the docs, then we should actually
> give a few different sample commands and even a sample shell script. If
> we give the users several alternatives, maybe they'll actually think
> about it instead of just C&P.

Sure, if we can think of some plausibly different samples.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-08-19 18:27:47 Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-08-19 17:19:34 Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic