Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Date: 2010-05-12 23:11:24
Message-ID: 840AE79F-9D4D-41F3-A8E2-E7D032C296D7@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 12, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I like 'pg_upgrade_support'. I could also do 'pg_upgrade_funcs'.

I misread the second one at a glance, so I recommend the first.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-12 23:47:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add PGFILEDESC description to Makefiles for all /contrib
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-12 23:07:03 Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts