| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Date: | 2024-05-17 19:51:49 |
| Message-ID: | 83ab316a682631315fb6994f9a63ae260d34c412.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2024-05-17 at 13:12 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > Long time ago there was a "rule" that people submitting patches are expected
> > to do reviews. Perhaps we should be more strict this.
>
> Big -1. How would we even be more strict about this? Public shaming? Withholding a commit?
I think it is a good rule. I don't think that it shouldn't lead to putting
people on the pillory or kicking their patches, but I imagine that a committer
looking for somebody else's patch to work on could prefer patches by people
who are doing their share of reviews.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-17 19:53:58 | Re: Propagate sanity checks of ProcessUtility() to standard_ProcessUtility()? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-05-17 19:50:10 | Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month) |