Re: Experience and feedback on pg_restore --data-only

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experience and feedback on pg_restore --data-only
Date: 2025-03-24 15:31:49
Message-ID: 832c1cdd-c0fe-464b-b4b9-f9d0482b9b78@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/24/25 07:24, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2025, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 23:48 +0100, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>>> Performance issues: (important as my db size is >5TB)
>>>
>>> * WAL writes: I didn't manage to avoid writing to the WAL, despite
>>> having
>>>    setting wal_level=minimal. I even wrote my own function to ALTER all
>>>    tables to UNLOGGED, but failed with "could not change table T to
>>>    unlogged because it references logged table".  I'm out of ideas on
>>> this
>>>    one.
>>
>> You'd have to create an load the table in the same transaction, that is,
>> you'd have to run pg_restore with --single-transaction.
>
> That would restore the schema from the dump, while I want to create the
> schema from the SQL code in version control.

I am not following, from your original post:

"
... create a
clean database by running the SQL schema definition from version
control, and then copy the data for only the tables created.

For this case, I choose to run pg_restore --data-only, and run it as the
user who owns the database (dbowner), not as a superuser, in order to
avoid changes being introduced under the radar.
"

You are running the process in two steps, where the first does not
involve pg_restore. Not sure why doing the pg_restore --data-only
portion in single transaction is not possible?

>
> Something that might work, would be for pg_restore to issue a TRUNCATE
> before the COPY. I believe this would require superuser privelege though,
> that I would prefer to avoid. Currently I issue TRUNCATE for all tables
> manually before running pg_restore, but of course this is in a different
> transaction so it doesn't help.
>
> By the way do you see potential problems with using --single-transaction
> to restore billion-rows tables?

COPY is all or none(version 17+ caveat(see
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-copy.html ON_ERROR)), so if
the data dump fails in --single-transaction everything rolls back.

>
>
> Thank you,
> Dimitris

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-03-24 15:41:35 Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX
Previous Message Dimitrios Apostolou 2025-03-24 14:24:17 Re: Experience and feedback on pg_restore --data-only