From: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM |
Date: | 2021-07-13 00:01:46 |
Message-ID: | 83053b47978225c7fdb72a0d9b23755fbd40d4db.camel@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2021-07-11 at 13:16 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:31:48PM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 16:27 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > + * outputlen: The length (0 or higher) of the client response buffer,
> > > + * invalid if output is NULL.
> >
> > nitpick: maybe "ignored" instead of "invalid"?
>
> Thanks, applied as 44bd012 after using your suggestion.
Thanks!
> Another thing I noticed after more review is that the check in
> fe-auth.c to make sure that a message needs to be generated if the
> exchange is not completed yet has no need to depend on "success", only
> "done".
Ah, right. I think the (!done && !success) case is probably indicative
of an API smell, but that's probably something to clean up in a future
pass.
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-07-13 00:17:55 | Re: Fix comments of heap_prune_chain() |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2021-07-13 00:01:38 | Re: enable_resultcache confusion |