Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes
Date: 2006-09-04 02:05:54
Message-ID: 8271.1157335554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> The two attached patches fix contrib/pgstattuple.

Good, applied. I made some additional changes to get install/uninstall/
reinstall to work cleanly after the latest additions, and to get it to
compile without warnings on a 64-bit Fedora machine. (It seems to
actually work there, too.)

I notice that the original pgstattuple() function comes in two flavors,
one with OID input and one with text-relation-name input. Shouldn't all
the others be likewise?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-04 02:06:26 Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-04 01:57:50 Re: autoconf version for back branches?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-04 02:06:26 Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2006-09-04 01:52:18 Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing