From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 |
Date: | 2006-09-04 02:06:26 |
Message-ID: | 44FB8A22.5050805@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>> Ideally, we would get Python to tell us the right location, because "use lib64
>>> if it exists" isn't the right solution.
>>>
>>> Is this fixed somewhere post 7.4?
>>>
>
>
>> Yes, but it was never backported. See:
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/config/python.m4
>>
>
> My recollection is that there are a number of interrelated changes going
> on there, and that a backport would have to touch a lot more than just
> the python stuff. So I'd recommend that it's not worth the trouble/risk.
> But if you want to have a go at extracting a small patch from the CVS
> history, have at it.
>
>
>
Patch attached - seems to work on my FC5/x86_64 box. Also contains the
OSX fix backported. Not sure that it qualifies as small though :-)
Unless there's an objection I will apply this soon (when were we
thinking of putting out the new point releases?)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-09-04 02:09:08 | Re: [HACKERS] python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-04 02:05:54 | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-09-04 02:09:08 | Re: [HACKERS] python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-04 02:05:54 | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |