Re: coverage increase for worker_spi

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: coverage increase for worker_spi
Date: 2019-06-01 17:23:05
Message-ID: 82513.1559409785@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I ended up with these two patches. I'm not sure about pushing
> separately. It seems pointless to backport the "fix" to back branches
> anyway.

Patch passes the eyeball test, though I did not try to run it.
I concur with squashing into one commit and applying to HEAD only.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-06-01 17:30:59 Re: Docs for refresh materialized view concurrently
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2019-06-01 16:57:31 Re: Index Skip Scan