Re: Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink and postgres_fdw

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink and postgres_fdw
Date: 2016-12-22 14:55:55
Message-ID: 8203.1482418555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/21/2016 09:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I see that you need to pass the PGconn into dblink_res_error() now, but
>> what's the point of the new "bool fail" parameter?

> That part isn't new -- we added it sometime prior to 9.2:

Oh! I misread the patch --- something about an unluckily-placed line
wrap and not looking very closely :-(. Yeah, it's fine as is.
Sorry for the noise.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kuntal Ghosh 2016-12-22 15:00:04 An attempt to reduce WALWriteLock contention
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-12-22 14:49:04 Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml