| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink and postgres_fdw |
| Date: | 2016-12-22 17:54:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4bdf36c8-f325-3059-7421-b92cad2aa894@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/22/2016 06:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> On 12/21/2016 09:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I see that you need to pass the PGconn into dblink_res_error() now, but
>>> what's the point of the new "bool fail" parameter?
>
>> That part isn't new -- we added it sometime prior to 9.2:
>
> Oh! I misread the patch --- something about an unluckily-placed line
> wrap and not looking very closely :-(. Yeah, it's fine as is.
> Sorry for the noise.
Thanks -- committed/backpatched to 9.2
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-12-22 17:59:50 | Re: An attempt to reduce WALWriteLock contention |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-22 17:50:55 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning. |