Re: pg_waldump and PREPARE

From: Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_waldump and PREPARE
Date: 2019-11-08 04:33:35
Message-ID: 819e45a2-cf36-8d85-7dd9-390c4d703705@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/11/2019 09:26, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Hello.
>
> At Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:23:41 +0500, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote in
>>> Can I switch the status back to "Needs review"?
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>
>> One issue is that your patch provides small information. WAL errors
>> Investigation often requires information on xid, subxacts,
>> delete-on-abort/commit rels; rarely - invalidation messages etc.
>
> Basically agrred, but it can be very large in certain cases, even if
> it is rare.

Maybe this is the reason for introducing a “verbose” option?

--
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2019-11-08 04:34:56 Re: Reorderbuffer crash during recovery
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-11-08 04:27:46 Re: adding partitioned tables to publications