Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date: 2010-02-24 16:08:19
Message-ID: 8114.1267027699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this system)
> Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn off build of documentation?

Would you show exactly what happened rather than arm-waving? I'm sure
that the majority of the buildfarm machines don't have jade installed,
but they're getting through their builds OK.

(And yes, there *is* a configure check.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-02-24 16:18:07 Re: Could not receive data from client: Unknown winsock error 10061
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-02-24 16:00:54 Re: BUG #5345: non-administrator users cannot create databases with special encoding