PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

From: Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date: 2010-02-24 15:51:19
Message-ID: 1138170319.8557671267026679670.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this system)

Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn off build of documentation?

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-24 15:54:46 Re: BUG #5338: PG_DUMP fails due to invalid adnum value
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-02-24 15:17:41 Re: BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.