Re: backhanded compliment from Larry Ellison

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backhanded compliment from Larry Ellison
Date: 2002-11-21 09:33:28
Message-ID: 81124B76C0CF364EBAC6CD213ABEDEF7289868@ARGON.edu.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> There are still some respects where we trail MS SQL Server:
> 1) slower performance on massive data updates
> 2) point-in-time recovery
> 3) in-database replication tools
> 4) GUI DBA tools (i.e. tools to manage configuration params,
> backup, process management)
> 5) automated version upgrade/patching

I'd like to add one more line to that list, which is definitly holding
us back from using it in a few situations:
6) Integrated Windows login.

Meaning once you're on the domain, you have your permissions in the
database server. I know we're all supposed to use web based applications
and do our security there and just log in with a fixed account in the
database, but in reality a huge amount of applications are still just
client<->RDBMS. And not requiring every user to remember *yet another*
password is a huge selling point for MS SQL.
Might work with Kerberos in some way - haven't tried that since we're
still on NT4 on the clients. NTLM is the one that works across different
windows versions...

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Hihn 2002-11-21 13:57:36 Re: backhanded compliment from Larry Ellison
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-11-21 08:31:26 Re: Mysql date/time, was Re: Press Release --