Re: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms
Date: 2003-06-07 03:46:12
Message-ID: 8076.1054957572@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> There are a number of reasons that IMHO moving the source out of the
> core project does not make sense for jdbc:

If I'm not misunderstanding here, the problem is that the JDBC sources
in the REL7_3 branch are current (if not, I'd say this is not Lamar's
fault ;-)) but that the derived .jar file was not current in the RPMs
that Lamar built?

I would suggest that we should find a mechanical solution for this.
The other derived files in the distro (bison and flex output, .html doc
files, etc) are more or less mechanically created and included --- no
one expects people to go off to a different web site to find 'em. Seems
like the JDBC jar file could be produced from the sources on the same
kind of terms.

I know Marc is a bit overworked at the moment :-( but when the dust
settles, perhaps you could consult with him about setting up an
automatic build process at developer.postgresql.org.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-07 15:27:02 Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Previous Message tih 2003-06-07 01:39:20 Approved