From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> |
Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms |
Date: | 2003-06-07 03:46:12 |
Message-ID: | 8076.1054957572@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> There are a number of reasons that IMHO moving the source out of the
> core project does not make sense for jdbc:
If I'm not misunderstanding here, the problem is that the JDBC sources
in the REL7_3 branch are current (if not, I'd say this is not Lamar's
fault ;-)) but that the derived .jar file was not current in the RPMs
that Lamar built?
I would suggest that we should find a mechanical solution for this.
The other derived files in the distro (bison and flex output, .html doc
files, etc) are more or less mechanically created and included --- no
one expects people to go off to a different web site to find 'em. Seems
like the JDBC jar file could be produced from the sources on the same
kind of terms.
I know Marc is a bit overworked at the moment :-( but when the dust
settles, perhaps you could consult with him about setting up an
automatic build process at developer.postgresql.org.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-07 15:27:02 | Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II |
Previous Message | tih | 2003-06-07 01:39:20 | Approved |