Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-07 15:27:02
Message-ID: 15534.1054999622@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> I think this was touched on before, but was there a final determination
> of the ordering of the "show all" command?

SHOW ALL will remain alphabetical.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-07 15:40:45 Re: Groups and roles
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-07 03:46:12 Re: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms