From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add support for <xti.h> |
Date: | 2000-10-23 13:35:36 |
Message-ID: | 8030.972308136@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com> writes:
> I've done bit more research. <xti.h> was the correct place to find
> TCP_NODELAY in UNIX98/SUSv2. However in the Austin Group draft of the
> next version of POSIX and UNIX0x/SUSv3, XTI has been dropped and
> <netinet/tcp.h> officially included.
OK, thanks for following up on that.
>> to revert the whole patch and instead make configure's test for
>> availability of <netinet/tcp.h> first include <netinet/in.h>, so
>> that that configure test will succeed on IRIX etc.
> I agree with this. Back out the patch and update configure.in.
Will do.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-23 13:43:34 | Re: AW: to_char() dumps core |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2000-10-23 13:29:36 | Re: failed runcheck |