Re: Add support for <xti.h>

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add support for <xti.h>
Date: 2000-10-23 13:35:36
Message-ID: 8030.972308136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com> writes:
> I've done bit more research. <xti.h> was the correct place to find
> TCP_NODELAY in UNIX98/SUSv2. However in the Austin Group draft of the
> next version of POSIX and UNIX0x/SUSv3, XTI has been dropped and
> <netinet/tcp.h> officially included.

OK, thanks for following up on that.

>> to revert the whole patch and instead make configure's test for
>> availability of <netinet/tcp.h> first include <netinet/in.h>, so
>> that that configure test will succeed on IRIX etc.

> I agree with this. Back out the patch and update configure.in.

Will do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-23 13:43:34 Re: AW: to_char() dumps core
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2000-10-23 13:29:36 Re: failed runcheck