Re: Add support for <xti.h>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add support for <xti.h>
Date: 2000-10-23 14:45:28
Message-ID: 200010231445.KAA02153@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

xti.h portion of patch has been backed out.

> Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com> writes:
> > I've done bit more research. <xti.h> was the correct place to find
> > TCP_NODELAY in UNIX98/SUSv2. However in the Austin Group draft of the
> > next version of POSIX and UNIX0x/SUSv3, XTI has been dropped and
> > <netinet/tcp.h> officially included.
>
> OK, thanks for following up on that.
>
> >> to revert the whole patch and instead make configure's test for
> >> availability of <netinet/tcp.h> first include <netinet/in.h>, so
> >> that that configure test will succeed on IRIX etc.
>
> > I agree with this. Back out the patch and update configure.in.
>
> Will do.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-23 14:45:33 Re: relation ### modified while in use
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-10-23 14:42:43 Re: question about new fmgr in 7.1 snapshots