Re: Performance features the 4th

Yes, I would like to see the vacuum delay patch go into 7.4.1 if possible.
It's really useful. I don't think there is any major risk in adding the
delay patch into a minor revision given the small amount of code change.

Stephen

""Matthew T. O'Connor"" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> wrote in message
news:3FA97470(dot)3020803(at)zeut(dot)net(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>As a matter of fact, people who have performance problems are likely to
> >>be the same who have upgrade problems. And as Gaetano pointed out
> >>correctly, we will see wildforms with one or the other feature applied.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I'd believe that for patches of the size of my original VACUUM-delay
> >hack (or even a production-grade version of same, which'd probably be
> >10x larger). The kind of wholesale rewrite you are currently proposing
> >is much too large to consider folding back into 7.4.*, IMHO.
> >
> >
> Do people think that the VACUUM-delay patch by itself, would be usefully
> enough on it's own to consider working it into 7.4.1 or something? From
> the little feedback I have read on the VACUUM-delay patch used in
> isolation, it certainly does help. I would love to see it put into 7.4
> somehow.
>
> The far more rigorous changes that Jan is working on, will be welcome
> improvements for 7.5.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>