From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance features the 4th |
Date: | 2003-11-05 22:06:40 |
Message-ID: | 3FA97470.3020803@zeut.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>As a matter of fact, people who have performance problems are likely to
>>be the same who have upgrade problems. And as Gaetano pointed out
>>correctly, we will see wildforms with one or the other feature applied.
>>
>>
>
>I'd believe that for patches of the size of my original VACUUM-delay
>hack (or even a production-grade version of same, which'd probably be
>10x larger). The kind of wholesale rewrite you are currently proposing
>is much too large to consider folding back into 7.4.*, IMHO.
>
>
Do people think that the VACUUM-delay patch by itself, would be usefully
enough on it's own to consider working it into 7.4.1 or something? From
the little feedback I have read on the VACUUM-delay patch used in
isolation, it certainly does help. I would love to see it put into 7.4
somehow.
The far more rigorous changes that Jan is working on, will be welcome
improvements for 7.5.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-05 22:08:03 | Re: Schema boggle... |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-05 22:02:58 | Re: Schema boggle... |