From: | "Vianello, Daniel A" <Daniel(dot)Vianello(at)charter(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: \i and \ir separated by \if now... |
Date: | 2018-05-27 02:51:36 |
Message-ID: | 7ed88fc71c304bada8b7527785dae45e@SC58MEXGP001.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> Uh, why would we list \ir before the simpler \i?
I believe the OP was complaining that the current order is:
\i or \include filename
(text)
\if expression
\elif expression
\else
\endif
(longer text)
\ir or \include_relative filename
(text)
and that before it was:
\i or \include filename
(text)
\ir or \include_relative filename
(text)
So that the request is to merge \ir into the \i section (not before \i but part of that discusstion) rather than being separated by the comparatively longer section for \if
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-05-27 03:08:47 | Re: \i and \ir separated by \if now... |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-05-26 19:15:58 | Typo in documentation page 6.1 Inserting Data |