Re: \i and \ir separated by \if now...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Vianello, Daniel A" <Daniel(dot)Vianello(at)charter(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: \i and \ir separated by \if now...
Date: 2018-05-27 03:08:47
Message-ID: 7974.1527390527@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

"Vianello, Daniel A" <Daniel(dot)Vianello(at)charter(dot)com> writes:
>> Uh, why would we list \ir before the simpler \i?

> So that the request is to merge \ir into the \i section (not before \i but part of that discusstion) rather than being separated by the comparatively longer section for \if

It was, in fact, like that initially. Peter E. changed it in commit
0d9bdbcaae0, without any discussion that I remember seeing. I've never
been very happy with "alphabetical order trumps all other considerations"
as a documentation rule, and this seems like a good example of why not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-05-28 17:17:16 Re: updatable cursors and ORDER BY
Previous Message Vianello, Daniel A 2018-05-27 02:51:36 RE: \i and \ir separated by \if now...