From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Role membership and DROP |
Date: | 2019-11-19 23:05:11 |
Message-ID: | 7ea5836d6b11299334e631b514b0d75a57c5cbf6.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 13:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 13:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > It might be worth clarifying this point in section 5.7,
> > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/ddl-priv.html
> > I like your second sentence, but I think that "the right ... is inherent
> > in being the ... owner" is unnecessarily complicated.
> > Removing the "always" and "only" makes the apparent contradiction between
> > the sentences less jarring to me.
>
> I think it's important to emphasize that this is implicit in object
> ownership.
>
> Looking at the page again, I notice that there's a para a little further
> down that overlaps quite a bit with what we're discussing here, but it's
> about implicit grant options rather than the right to DROP. In the
> attached, I reworded that too, and moved it because it's not fully
> intelligible until we've explained grant options. Thoughts?
I am fine with that.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2019-11-20 00:19:51 | Re: Small typo in func.sgml |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2019-11-19 22:55:44 | Re: Difference between Bulk Load (Multiple inserts or single inserts) and COPY |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com | 2019-11-20 01:06:42 | RE: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2019-11-19 23:01:42 | Re: Proposal- GUC for max dead rows before autovacuum |