Re: Role membership and DROP

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Role membership and DROP
Date: 2019-11-20 17:27:56
Message-ID: 15791.1574270876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 13:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looking at the page again, I notice that there's a para a little further
>> down that overlaps quite a bit with what we're discussing here, but it's
>> about implicit grant options rather than the right to DROP. In the
>> attached, I reworded that too, and moved it because it's not fully
>> intelligible until we've explained grant options. Thoughts?

> I am fine with that.

OK, pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2019-11-20 17:55:09 COPY FROM needs better example
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2019-11-20 16:02:16 Re: Odd markup in SSL mode table

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-11-20 17:36:50 Re: why doesn't optimizer can pull up where a > ( ... )
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-11-20 17:25:37 Re: why doesn't optimizer can pull up where a > ( ... )