Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill

From: "Shashank Tripathi" <shashank(dot)tripathi(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill
Date: 2007-01-21 06:34:44
Message-ID: 7cab9c1b0701202234j1d357d88lf1ca20f2ec355037@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> It's a valid discussion here (although better on -advocacy), because it helps
> me have the right facts to present to clients about whether they should stay
> with a legacy database in MySQL vs upgrading to a modern PostgreSQL.

For all its flaws, MySQL is catching on quick and has a very active
community of developments that several of us find rather handy -
http://forge.mysql.com/

Is there something similar for Pgsql? (Disclaimer: new to this group
because I'm unimpressed with MySQL beyond 30 million rows in a table
that require advanced subqueries).

Shanx

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dean 2007-01-21 08:16:07 Re: Help : Microsoft SQL Server equivalents in PostGreSQL
Previous Message Randal L. Schwartz 2007-01-21 06:17:46 Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill