| From: | Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: replacements for vacuum? |
| Date: | 2004-12-18 02:53:42 |
| Message-ID: | 7c1574a90412171853788c8acc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:28:30 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:50:42 -0800,
> Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > Are there any alternatives to vacuum (and, i'm aware of autovacuum)?
>
> What problem are you trying to solve?
I'd like to be able to run vacuum in a 'test' or read-only mode where
i'd see what it would do before actually running it. I don't see any
mention of any options to accomplish this in the vacuum man page.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama(at)gmail(dot)com
LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-18 04:10:41 | Re: unix_socket_directory |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-12-18 02:46:34 | Re: Scheduler in Postgres |