Re: replacements for vacuum?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replacements for vacuum?
Date: 2004-12-18 05:13:56
Message-ID: 27999.1103346836@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'd like to be able to run vacuum in a 'test' or read-only mode where
> i'd see what it would do before actually running it.

Er ... what possible value would that have? ISTM it would expend 80% of
the effort to achieve 0% of the result.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-12-18 05:16:34 Re: Contacting Tom Lane :)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-18 05:10:49 Re: OSX 10.3.7 broke Postgresql 8.0.0b5?