| From: | "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql-General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CPU |
| Date: | 2007-12-04 09:40:16 |
| Message-ID: | 7be3f35d0712040140w3d32a7d4x43d4832649b3be7f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Josh,
However, the two extra cores (even if slower), will greatly help if you
> have any kind of concurrency.
>
as much as I understand with running Postgres in the default configuration,
there *will* be concurrency, without an "if" ?
I am thinking of the background writer, the autovacuum process, the log
writer and finally the connection serving process. ... quite sure of that
"default concurrency" because I had to explain those basic 5 postgres.exe to
at least 8 Windows Admins...
My non-benchmarked experience is that "multicore and postgres good"
(experience mainly drawn from windows)
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger Straße 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
fx 01212-5-13695179
-
EuroPython 2008 will take place in Vilnius, Lithuania - Stay tuned!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian Rengstl | 2007-12-04 10:31:41 | Fwd: Re: Archiving problem on Windows |
| Previous Message | Louis-David Mitterrand | 2007-12-04 09:09:26 | 8.3beta4 needs a dump/restore? |