Re: CPU

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Allison <tom(at)tacocat(dot)net>
Subject: Re: CPU
Date: 2007-12-04 03:27:31
Message-ID: 4754C923.8000405@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Uwe C. Schroeder wrote:
> On Monday 03 December 2007, Tom Allison wrote:
>> is there much of a difference in performance between a XEON, dual
>> core from intel and a dual core AMD 64 CPU?

Well honestly, with how cheap you can get a quad core from Intel... I
say do that :). The general difference between a dual core opteron and a
dual core xeon will likely not be noticeable to a PostgreSQL
installation (generally speaking).

However, the two extra cores (even if slower), will greatly help if you
have any kind of concurrency.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

  • Re: CPU at 2007-12-04 03:12:24 from Uwe C. Schroeder

Responses

  • Re: CPU at 2007-12-04 04:30:58 from Ron Johnson
  • Re: CPU at 2007-12-04 05:11:28 from Greg Smith
  • Re: CPU at 2007-12-04 09:40:16 from Harald Armin Massa

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2007-12-04 04:30:58 Re: CPU
Previous Message Uwe C. Schroeder 2007-12-04 03:12:24 Re: CPU