From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | "Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@ |
Date: | 2019-07-30 13:30:23 |
Message-ID: | 7F4FEDD4-EF1E-4CEE-A2CF-11FCE1792456@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 00:25, Nasby, Jim <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 29, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2019-Jul-29, Nasby, Jim wrote:
>>
>>> At pgCon we had an BoF for projects/companies that are maintaining
>>> either forks of Postgres (ie: Aurora Postgres, EDB, Greenplum, BDR),
>>> or extensions that interact heavily with internals (ie: Citus,
>>> TimescaleDB). We’d like to have a mailing list to facilitate further
>>> discussion in this area.
>>
>> Neat. Where do they hold such discussions currently?
>
> Any discussion is currently completely ad-hoc, via various methods. Though really I suspect the best answer is “they don’t”.
Being one of the stakeholders (and BoF participants), I can only agree with
this, they largely don’t (or are limited to hallway tracks). The idea is to
try and improve collaboration by providing a place for discussion.
cheers ./daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2019-07-30 13:35:50 | Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@ |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2019-07-30 13:16:10 | Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@ |