Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
Date: 2019-07-30 13:35:50
Message-ID: 27a24918-29a0-d5a0-7b81-b80b88077cf8@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 7/30/19 8:16 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 22:57, Nasby, Jim <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com
> <mailto:nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> At pgCon we had an BoF for projects/companies that are maintaining
> either forks of Postgres (ie: Aurora Postgres, EDB, Greenplum, BDR),
> or extensions that interact heavily with internals (ie: Citus,
> TimescaleDB). We’d like to have a mailing list to facilitate further
> discussion in this area.____
>
>
> BDR3 is not a fork of Postgres, but it is an extension.

On that note, I'd be a +1 for "pgsql-extensions" as it would certainly
help facilitate above suggested communication. It would be all
encompassing of extensions, forks, etc.

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-07-30 13:38:42 Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-07-30 13:30:23 Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@