Re: PG "Users" page?

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG "Users" page?
Date: 2016-09-12 14:53:49
Message-ID: 7E441243-990F-4377-B5F8-95B0904F7C3F@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> On Sep 12, 2016, at 8:49 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org <mailto:dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>> wrote:
>
>
> > On 11 Sep 2016, at 16:55, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi us,
> >
> > Just noticed that our Featured Users page has “Sun Microsystems” listed:
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/about/users/ <https://www.postgresql.org/about/users/>
> > (Under “Technology” at the bottom)
> >
> > Should we update that to say “Oracle” :D … or maybe just nuke that entry?
>
> That page is completely unmaintained. I proposed removing it a couple of years back, but was met with strong objections coupled with a complete lack of volunteers to actually do the work to keep it up to date.
>
> I strongly feel it should be removed still - it is probably responsible for 25% of emails to webmaster@ from random companies requesting inclusion.
>
>
> Given that it really isn't being maintained, and that it actually takes a decent amount of time for somebody to maintain it in a way to make it actually *valuable* to visitors, I'll give a strong +1 for removing it.

+1

> If we want just a list of users, we could do that and make it self-service (meaning you just sign up and fill in your details - like we have for professional services). But that's something very different from being a featured user.

+1 - but it goes back to Dave’s point of lack of criteria for how users get listed, even if we make it self-signup. We would probably want to moderate it similar to the self-published content to avoid spam, etc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2016-09-13 17:55:41 Re: DRAFT 9.6 release -- is Final
Previous Message Gilberto Castillo 2016-09-12 13:45:14 Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: PG "Users" page?