From: | "Gilberto Castillo" <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy Group" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: PG "Users" page? |
Date: | 2016-09-12 13:45:14 |
Message-ID: | 57705.192.168.207.54.1473687914.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>
>
>> On 11 Sep 2016, at 17:27, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> On 11 Sep 2016, at 17:14, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>> On 11 Sep 2016, at 16:55, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi us,
>>>>
>>>> Just noticed that our Featured Users page has “Sun Microsystems”
>>>> listed:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/users/
>>>> (Under “Technology” at the bottom)
>>>>
>>>> Should we update that to say “Oracle” :D … or maybe just nuke that
>>>> entry?
>>>
>>> That page is completely unmaintained. I proposed removing it a couple
>>> of years back, but was met with strong objections coupled with a
>>> complete lack of volunteers to actually do the work to keep it up to
>>> date.
>>>
>>> I strongly feel it should be removed still - it is probably responsible
>>> for 25% of emails to webmaster@ from random companies requesting
>>> inclusion.
>>
>> Do they seem like legit requests, or more like companies not really
>> using
>> PG?
>>
>> If it seems like the 2nd, maybe we could have a policy like this?
>>
>> “We’re happy to include any company here who actively helps out on
>> our mailing lists, and describes in detail their PostgreSQL usage
>> on their website.”
>>
>> That’s coming from a “lets set a high bar to meet” perspective, which
>> might help weed out nuisance requests. :)
>
> Oh, I'm sure the majority are legit. The point is that it's a 'Featured'
> user page, not just a random list of users which would be so incomplete
> and, well, random, that it would have little use.
>
> A featured list requires assessment of requests, some sort of inclusion
> criteria, and one or more people to deal with all that, make the decision
> and update the site. We're generally pretty bad at doing that sort of
> thing.
>
Uhmmm, Who have all the information? Who knows the way on how to check the
information?
This is point!!!
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
ETECSA, La Habana, Cuba
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2016-09-12 14:53:49 | Re: PG "Users" page? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-09-12 12:49:51 | Re: PG "Users" page? |