Re: Language support of postgresql

From: "Martel, Hong" <Hong(dot)Martel(at)saabsensis(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Language support of postgresql
Date: 2017-04-28 14:45:25
Message-ID: 7E31FC9B93813E419B326AE1D0C80839668DC14C@corpmail01.corp.sensis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

As I understand, currently Postgres doesn’t support Chinese encoding GBK and BIG5 on both server and client side, only UNICODE. Is it true? Are there any plans for postgresql team to implement GBK and BIG5 encoding anytime soon?

Are there any alternative solutions for this besides switching our database to Oracle or others that support the encodings? One of our customers insists that we need to support all three encoding (BIG5, GB2312 安and UNICODE). We would love to stick to Postgres if there is any alternative way to solve the problem without incurring big cost.

Thank you very much for your time and attention.

Sincerely,
Hong Martel
Software Developer

This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is company confidential or privileged. Any technical data in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and advise the sender immediately.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2017-04-28 14:46:18 Re: PostgreSQL Required Monitoring
Previous Message Andrew Kerber 2017-04-28 14:39:35 PostgreSQL Required Monitoring