Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Netapp SnapCenter

From: Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Wolff, Ken L" <ken(dot)l(dot)wolff(at)lmco(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Netapp SnapCenter
Date: 2020-06-29 15:34:20
Message-ID: 7D60E853-C090-467B-AE46-B9DC3D0EDF30@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Stephen,

> On 29. Jun, 2020, at 17:29, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I typically recommend rather strongly against using anything that won't
> allow you to update to keep pace with PG minor versions, considering
> they include critical security and corruption fixes (in some cases, but
> even if they don't, they're important to install).

I know and I totally agree.

> Time to consider an alternative product, imv.

again, I absolutely agree. I told them so but I can't influence that. So I'm basically stuck with the versions we have for all databases which are involved in Qlik replications. All others I can upgrade at will, and I do so. :-)

Cheers,
Paul

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Glennon 2020-06-29 22:16:40 PostgreSQL database segsize
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2020-06-29 15:33:12 Re: pgbench and timestamps