Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Netapp SnapCenter

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Wolff, Ken L" <ken(dot)l(dot)wolff(at)lmco(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Netapp SnapCenter
Date: 2020-06-29 15:29:52
Message-ID: 20200629152952.GE3125@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greetings,

* Paul Förster (paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > On 29. Jun, 2020, at 16:43, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > I certainly don't blame you, particularly given all the changes
> > regarding how restore is done which went into v12- obviously anything
> > that hasn't been updated since before v12 was released isn't going to
> > work with those changes.
>
> we have 11.6 and 12.3. 11.6 because we (unfortunately) have to use Qlik (formerly Attunity). And no, that again wasn't my decision. Databases which are involved in Qlik replication can't be updated (yet) according to our Qlik specialist. I had a big argument with him when I updated even from 11.5 to 11.6. This means I can't even update to 11.8.

I typically recommend rather strongly against using anything that won't
allow you to update to keep pace with PG minor versions, considering
they include critical security and corruption fixes (in some cases, but
even if they don't, they're important to install).

Time to consider an alternative product, imv.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2020-06-29 15:33:12 Re: pgbench and timestamps
Previous Message Paul Förster 2020-06-29 15:18:24 Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Netapp SnapCenter