Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

> On 6 Aug 2021, at 21:01, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Are you going to commit these?

Absolutely, a combination of unplanned home renovations and vacations changed
my plans a bit recently.

> Note that with release wraps scheduled for Monday, we are probably
> already past the time when it'd be wise to push anything that has
> a significant chance of introducing portability issues. There's
> just not much time to deal with it if the buildfarm shows problems.
> So unless you intend this as HEAD-only, I'd counsel waiting for the
> release window to pass.

Until there is an animal running OpenSSL 3.0.0 in the buildfarm I think this
should be HEAD only. Further down the line we need to support OpenSSL 3 in all
backbranches IMO since they are all equally likely to be compiled against it,
but not until we can regularly test against it in the farm.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/