Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date: 2021-08-06 19:17:28
Message-ID: 2501371.1628277448@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> Until there is an animal running OpenSSL 3.0.0 in the buildfarm I think this
> should be HEAD only. Further down the line we need to support OpenSSL 3 in all
> backbranches IMO since they are all equally likely to be compiled against it,
> but not until we can regularly test against it in the farm.

Works for me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2021-08-06 20:23:39 Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-08-06 19:14:15 Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility